PrivacySpeak
Navigating the world of telemarketing, data privacy & AI
Search past articles:
Consent Complications Sink TCPA Class in Texas
In Mitchell v. Dallas, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212107 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2025), a Texas federal court refused to certify a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class against Toyota of Dallas, and it all came down to consent.
One Word, No Class: “Residential” Definition Sinks TCPA Case
In Schmitendorf v. Juicy’s Vapor Lounge, Inc., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208110 (D. Kan. Oct. 21, 2025), the court reminded everyone involved in TCPA class actions that sometimes a single word—“residential”—can determine the fate of the entire case.
No Injury, No Problem? Supreme Court Sidesteps Critical Class Issue in LabCorp v. Davis
On June 5, 2025, the Supreme Court quietly walked away from one of the most anticipated class action cases of the year. It declined to answer a deceptively simple, but incredibly important question: Can a class action for damages under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 include people who weren’t actually injured?
The content of PrivacySpeak is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a qualified attorney. Information provided may not apply to all jurisdictions and may be subject to change. © 2025 Bubeck Law LLC